The No Think society


Paul Wallis, Sydney Media Jam CO2A No Think society is a recipe for failure. In the past, No Think societies have blundered on regardless down the millennia, crashing whole civilisations. Now, the same No Think mentality is destroying this civilisation just as effectively.

No Think, defined

A No Think environment is typically all about means and processes, rather than objectives. Goals are vague, and often just token rhetoric, like “… for our children, and our children’s children”, utterly meaningless. (Thatcher’s “children’s children” are a monument to the barrenness of No Think.)

At best, No Think goes from A to B, however haphazardly or insanely. Even the idea of more steps from C-Z doesn’t begin to enter the “thinking”. No Think is also stunningly undemanding in terms of logic. There’s little or no If/then logic, aka contingency logic/step logic/using your brain for something other than keeping your ears apart.

No Think is also extremely simplistic, almost insultingly so. Generally, it’s no more than a jingle, like Make America Great Again or Peace in Our Time. Even the physical realities are somehow expected to follow the jingle, not the facts. Greatness and peace need more than verbosity to happen.

The ramifications of No Think

No Think is also highly counterproductive. For example:

  • Generations full of plagues of psychologists and psychiatrists now exist with unheard-of levels of mental illness. (To be fair, many psychologists and psychiatrists are among the most ferocious critics of this situation.) The No Think theory is that if someone’s there to do a job, it must be being done. It isn’t.
  • Human rights is a major cause for all progressives. It’s even accepted by conservatives, however unenthusiastically. Human rights abuse in the No Think world is now as bad as it’s ever been. Slavery is higher than ever before.
  • Poverty is the all-time leading disaster in human life. Attempts to end or alleviate poverty are ongoing and sincere, but the No Think society, with its one step logic, doesn’t get it. Even by its own very shallow standards, poverty is bad for a No Think society. Poverty means lower economic participation, lower revenue, less business, and serious obstacles to productivity. See anyone actually doing anything about ending poverty?
  • Pollution is poison. Any one of those toxic chemicals can kill you or give you a serious medical condition. Some of the chemicals make compounds of each other, and nobody really knows what they can do. You, on the other hand, are more likely than ever to find out. You’re in big trouble, hit with serious medical expenses, and is anyone doing anything about pollution. Only very slowly and grudgingly. The No Think approach is that “pollution is business”. That’s it. No more thinking has been done. The result is a pole to pole sewer full of toxic materials and very large numbers of very sick people.
  • High fructose syrup is generally considered very dangerous. The rates of obesity and diabetes have gone up drastically in the last generation. High fructose is one of the major culprits. It took at least a decade for even the basic theory of the risks of high fructose to filter through the No Think political environment.
  • Carbon emissions are quite unnecessary and easily preventable with proper process filtering and better, cleaner, combustion. Carbon products like coal and oil can be used to make much safer products that earn more money for producers. Is any of that that happening? No. Again, “Pollution is business,” and the rest is just lying.
  • Polarization is extremely bad for societies. In the whole of human history, there has never been anything safe about people who hate each other’s guts living side by side. What’s happening in No Think Land? Deliberate polarization, and it’s a career for a lot of people.
  • Crime is parasitism. The No Think society is “tough on crime”, but is that having any real impact? No. Quite the opposite, crime rakes in about $1 trillion per year, at the expense of the entire human race. The ridiculous War on Drugs simply bankrolled organized crime, which now contaminates and corrupts just about all sectors of business. No Think, not surprisingly and as usual, has no answers and no ideas.

Yes, this could go on forever, and I’m not going to waste my time or yours on the very long list of subjects. The real issue is the No Think problem. If you don’t think about possible outcomes, you’re going to hit the fan sooner or later. If you don’t model and plan, you don’t have either a model or a real plan.

No Think = No Criticism

One thing that fascinates me about No Think is that all forms of criticism are blocked, however ineptly. Facts are ignored, ideas are simply not developed, and practical issues are rarely mentioned. Even the theory of public, let alone expert, input and criticism is simply absurd in most cases.

Not helping matters much is the fact that in many cases the criticism, particularly expert criticism, isn’t even understood. If your mindset is that A to B = making money, then no criticism is likely to be seriously considered. If the mindset is tail protection, then criticism is very unlikely to be acted upon.

A con man is a good example. The last thing a con man wants a victim to do is think. The fewer risks the victim is aware of, the better. Now apply that theory to global finance. See how those ridiculous, impossible Third World and Greek loan scenarios fit so well in to No Think business? No Think is a built-in barrier to accurate assessment of anything. If you don’t think, you can’t argue.

No Think Executive Culture

Gothic Black, Paul Wallis books Amazon

This book is all about fears. It includes a monster which learns how to bore people to death and the wonderful town of Pithcurdle, in which the coming of the dreaded Toothpaste Man is a cause for celebration.

C.N. Parkinson, author of Parkinson’s Law, made a very accurate assessment of No Think. He said that the targets are very close, so scoring is high. This is a type of incrementalism, the sort that claims that a 1% increase in something or saving money on wages by sacking staff is some sort of achievement.

It isn’t, and can’t be. The nominal figures are also open to debate, given that you’ve just lost your income-earning staff, and that 1% barely equates to inflation. You’ve met your pathetic goals, and patted yourself on the back, but nothing much has actually been done.

Now imagine a world invested in endless executive meetings, where this is the default method of doing quite literally everything. Whether it’s education, health, or a war, this No Think is based on minimal actual logic, perspective, or anything else which could be called mental activity of any kind.

Political No Think is roughly similar, and can be society-wide. The French Revolution against monarchy resulted in an Emperor, Napoleon. The great egalitarian Bolshevik revolution resulted in an oligarchy of privilege for some, and death and misery for millions.

Military No Think

The longest-running and best documented example of No Think is military. In the very first recorded battle in history, a Pharaoh rewrote history so that he was seen as the main hero in winning the battle of Megiddo. The Crusades were recorded as noble adventures in the name of God, but were in fact sleazy, personal-empire-building, failures involving massacres of everybody, including Christians. The Thirty Years’ War decimated central Europe as badly as the Plague, but was always portrayed as a religious cleansing by BOTH sides.

Paul Wallis, Live Lazy and Love It, Amazon

The theory of this book is that if you can afford to be lazy, you must be doing something right.

In World War One, the idea that unprotected human beings charging machine guns was a bad move took 3 years, and millions of casualties, to sink in. World War One itself was totally unnecessary, but its No Think logic paved the way for Hitler, World War 2, and everything else that followed at the expense of slaughtering two generations. The War to End All Wars produced nothing BUT more wars.

Talk about counterproductive – The British Empire, which had absolutely no reason to get involved at all in World War One, started itself on the way to oblivion. The Austrians, who started the war, lost their empire, as did the Russians and Germans. France, the unwilling host of the worst of the war, turned in to a gigantic graveyard from the Channel to the Swiss border.

In Vietnam, 50 years later, no amount of tactical or political information seemed to make the slightest difference. A No Think political  mindset ignored both the successes and the failures. Having discarded the military option and obviously not considered any others, it tried for that most untrustworthy of escapes, a “political solution” which definitively lost the war.

This is No Think incarnate – Stupid, thoughtless decisions based on nothing resembling real logic. The 20th century was the warning. The 21st century may well be the tombstone.

The world can’t afford this type of super-idiocy any more. If you’re not thinking, you can’t really be in control of anything. Situations need to be managed. The next big mistake may be the last. All problems can be solved. Mistakes can be rectified. If they’re not, it’s well past time to go, humanity. Nobody’s wearing T shirts saying “Save the Stupid”, are they?


Read a few of my books and claim that they’re interesting. Nobody will believe you, they’ll think you’re a nut, and you can frolic to your heart’s content.

SMJ hasn’t been updated for a while, thanks largely to volume of work and Amazon’s various new features, which I’ll have to manually add. Expect something, but no idea when. 



The Global Stupidity Plague


This is the Age of Dumb. Stupidity is now a force of human nature, if not the other kind of Nature, which seems unimpressed. Homo Sapiens, not famous for its intelligence, but not this dumb, is experiencing a true plague of stupidity.


Let’s get through the obvious manifestations of Stupidity Uber Alles  first:


  • Governments: Politics is obsolete. It’s about getting elected, creating conflicts, and making things worse. The whole idea of government needs to be about fully accountable, properly oversighted people doing things right, not this planetwide disorganized mess.
  • Culture: There is no culture. The banal, pointlessly trivial, endlessly obstructed lives most people live can’t fit culture in anywhere. There’s nowhere to put a culture in this boorish sewer of a world. How do you fit a culture in to poverty?
  • Society is non-existent. Thanks to governments and lack of culture, society is a word, not a fact. There’s no social cohesion at any level. Quite the opposite, hating other members of the society is now the norm, and highly socially destructive.
  • Crime: Generations of corrupt weaklings and idiots being “tough on crime” have produced the richest criminals in history, bankrolled by stupid, useless governments and pointless laws making everything illegal extremely profitable.
  • Progress: Progress ground to a halt decades ago. Forget gadgets using 1970s touch screen tech and binary code, which are ancient tech. Digitization did make a difference, but only to the technology, not the people. Apes using phones are still apes.
  • Sanity: Sanity is unmarketable in any form, for any reason, in any sector. The fabulously out of touch “meeting culture”, in which executive gargoyles can be away from their actual jobs for decades, has removed any need for rational thought at all levels of commerce and leadership.
  • Careers: Most careers will cease to exist soon enough, as expertise is taken over by Artificial intelligence, which couldn’t possibly be any dumber than human intelligence. A career will be like a successful game show contestant.
  • Pollution: Pollution was almost under control 30 years ago. Now it’s a religion among the truly unhygienic minds in charge. To pollute on principle, which is how it’s done now, is to say you’re a grovelling little sycophant peasant like everybody else in your septic tank of a life with no opinions of your own, and you want to network.
  • Health: Thanks to the above stresses and unsanitary ex-societies, a huge number of people are suffering from various medical conditions. In the past, the opposite was the case. The eternal hordes in hospital ERs and elsewhere are relatively recent.

So… Do you think there’s a problem?

Paul Wallis, Live Lazy and Love It, AmazonConsider this – All of these things are anti-survival. It’s like living for no other reason than to find a cliff to fall off. This is Applied Stupidity, in its most unambiguous form. Stupid things are said – And believed. Stupid things are done – And considered brilliant.

So what’s new, you ask, finding a new (inconsiderately empty) beer bottle in which to live? Humans aren’t that stupid, that’s what. Even for a species which built enough nukes to wipe out itself and everything else at least 7 times over, this is dumb.


The current manifestations of stupidity are:

  • Refusal to deal with any major issues on any level, however disastrous.
  • Obsession with trivia at the expense of major issues.
  • Prolonging and tolerating useless conflicts all over the world.
  • Failure to deal with basics, ranging from water to food, health education and housing.
  • Incomprehension of the obvious, with denials in the face of facts.
  • Ignoring experts.
  • Tolerating corruption.
  • Tolerating greed.
    Ignoring the public interest in EVERY area, all the time.
  • Paying freeloaders to run countries.
  • Electing freeloaders to run countries.
  • Wondering what went wrong afterwards.

The most primitive societies were survival-based. If you tried doing any of these things in a cave society, your chances of getting a woolly mammoth parked up your backside were excellent. In this society, you get cheers and applause based on how anti-survival you are.

Hierarchical societies are effectively hierarchies of stupidity. The more senior, more experienced idiots rule. In this society, which is made entirely of hierarchies, stupidity is a virtual law of physics. The more stupid the action, the more stupid the result, and the more stupid people are, the more they fail to see that.

Remember “normality? Thanks to stupidity, most people don’t.

The normality of the past in the West was based on:

  • Clean, safe, if not palatial, homes.
  • Just about everything was more or less affordable, except major luxuries.
  • Health care whenever you wanted.
  • Public sanitation and hygiene were pretty good.
  • Air was breathable.
  • Food was edible.
  • The sea didn’t make you sick when you swam in it.
  • Pollution levels were much lower.
  • Psychological conditions like depression were much rarer.
  • Reasonably good, if not dazzling, education.
  • Much fewer people, less crowding, less stress.
  • Workplace culture wasn’t psychotic.
  • People weren’t paid to make workplaces psychotic.
  • A good chance of a career, with considerable effort.
  • Almost no nutcases, anywhere.
  • Very low levels of crime, and mainly minor crime except for organized crime.
  • No hordes of fanatics, and the few there were, were despised.
  • To be a sycophant was to be a failure.
  • Talent wasn’t hated.
    Intellect wasn’t hated.
  • The people with the skills did the jobs, not people pretending to do them.
Paul Wallis books, sydney media jam

This book is all about creative ideas. Nobody has yet died of reading it, but it’s a pretty tough call for those not familiar with working with ideas. “Passive voice”, eh?

Forge the exceptions for a minute; that’s not the point – These relatively modest, unpretentious, things were reasonable expectations. They weren’t called “welfare” or “entitlements” and certainly not the result of any ideology except the right to personal freedom.

They were also legitimate expectations after the worst war in human history. Politicians didn’t win that war. They caused it, and damn near lost it so often it’s amazing it turned out the way it did. The public certainly didn’t idolize politicians. JFK was the last modern politician to be truly admired.

Progress meant physical wellbeing, quality of life, scientific and social. That was “not stupid” in context with the way things are now.  An educated society made an educated choice.

The pathology of the global stupidity plague.

So up to about 1970 or so, humanity, if no collective genius, was survival oriented and doing pretty well. That date is important.

You need to be able to track a plague from its inception. The history of bad decisions dates from about then. The Nixon era, in which the last Republican, Dwight D. Eisenhower, was a dim memory, started a culture of bad decisions.

The dumb can lead the dumb. Bad decisions, of course, are a great way of creating opportunities for more bad decisions. Following global leaders may not have reached the abysmal depths of Nixon until now, but these were the symptoms after Nixon:

  • The USSR collapsed after massive mismanagement.
  • Japan destroyed its well-proven social system and replaced it with a stagnant nothing.
  • The USA, as the “world’s only superpower”, went backwards socially, technically, educationally, politically and morally from the 1980s onwards as a result of “conscious” political policies. The anti-intellect culture started then, too.
  • The Middle East, one of the most prosperous areas in the world, went in to meltdown.
  • Europe made many bad calls on the refugee and debt crises, compromising its own credibility and global image. Financial scandals like LIBOR added to the general malaise of maladministration.
  • Britain chose Brexit, without a plan to achieve it, or a model for existence outside the EU.
  • My own country, Australia, mismanaged everything and got everything backwards economically, technologically and socially. That’s not so new; it’s just that the current degree of mismanagement is unusually thorough, even for our very low standard idiots.
  • People with no scientific credentials at all, and obviously no basic knowledge of chemistry, became experts on global climate.

So – This is a plague of stupidity. These were all terrible decisions, affecting the entire world. The logic is delirious, unfocused, and farcically wrong. Babble is everywhere.  Nobodies are suddenly VIPs. Doing dumb things is now normal. Believing anything, however obviously false, is now normal.

This is a very sick world, and it’s not trying too hard to get better.  That’s a particularly damning statement. Nothing is really being done about anything important, on any level.

Plagues usually burn themselves out, sooner or later.  The current insanities will pass. Even the Black Death eventually ended. The damage, however, may not be so easy to undo this time.

Most of the problems above are fixable. It would be relatively easy to achieve a modern version of the old normal. It’s not happening, or even being considered. That, folks, is ultra-stupid, and it could be fatal.

“Make the world smart again” may not be much of a catchphrase, but it beats crap out of the alternatives.


Civilization failure imminent – So what’s new?


Paul Wallis, Sydney Media JamAll previous civilizations have fallen. This pathetic chicken coop of an attempt at a civilization is apparently determined to achieve oblivion, whatever the cost.

Consider the average chicken coop – It’s full of birds which lay eggs, occasionally get eaten, and when not shitting all over their environment, peck each other and make life difficult for other chickens. Human birdbrains are delivering much the same effect, and they actually think it’s normal.

Nor do chickens spend a lot of time thinking about their next moves, which may be either in to the pot or into egg-laying gulags. As Brexit just proved so efficiently, thought about what happens next is now almost illegal in human societies. No planning, just some pointless collection of obsolete geriatric eunuchs trying to secede from their responsibilities.

Chickens can’t be accused, however, of destroying the future. You remember the future – That thing you’re not supposed to understand which will come along in whatever disorganized, putrescent mess the past allows. Continue reading

Writing about stupidity


Wasp2It’s an American election year/millennium, and for some reason I’ve decided to write about the issues involved in writing about stupidity. What a coincidence.

How many things do you see in person or on media which are basically sagas of stupidity? How many unnecessary, repulsive, useless things that should never happen? Now – How would you feel to write about these things every day? Think it might get a bit samey?

Stupidity is a monoculture. The only variation is in the nouns and verbs. Everything else is the same. Something obviously dumb is done, and the rest is the collateral damage to people’s lives.

DC Doom page 30Stupidity is the worthless, the futile, and the insane, in one ongoing, unwholesome package. Try being a humanist when all you write about is moronic events. Even the insanity looks like some sort of recipe – Get something wrong, or some basically false fact, add a few idiots of any flavor, and just go from there.

To say that I’m fed up to the back teeth with these endless idiocies is a massive understatement. So much of it is recycled stupidity, too. It’s ancient crap, with a more recent date. There are so many interesting, exciting things happening – And they never get a mention. The primitive, the regressive, the mindless, you name it – Most of the “news” belongs in some prehistoric dunghill. If someone invents a pyramid-shaped wheel again and again, don’t be surprised.

Job page 23Then there’s the hysteria – How excited and enthusiastic can you get about stupidity? Some people become fanatics, supporting one form of total lunacy against another. The most repulsive of the lunacies are those which are “omniscient”. All other idiots, presumably, are wrong, immoral, and criminal. Sound familiar? It should. It’s all that’s in the US headlines right now.

You can make allowances for people being credulous. You can understand people preferring one view to another. It’s just that when everything hits the fan around the world, as it’s been doing for a decade or so, you expect people to learn. Not to simply continue clutching the illusory teddy bears of ideologies, unquestioningly believing in things which have never existed.

Didn't know that, eh?

Didn’t know that, eh?

This is the life support for stupidity – Belief that it’s anything but stupidity. The theory, for example, that effective administration of a modern society somehow equates to 100-year-old dogma and social structures is more than a bit questionable. The idea that politics, which does nothing but create problems for the future, will solve problems is like saying a disease cures you of doctors. A church comprised of pedophiles, money launderers and apologists for pedophiles needs credulity and gullibility much more than faith. The common media theme that crime is entertaining supports global crime in a way no form of brainwashing ever could. A financial system which preaches greed at everyone’s expense and expects respect is another example of how belief promotes stupidity. On that basis, Bernie Madoff should be a saint.

Ads_Cover_for_KindleStupidity in action can be defined as doing something which is wrong, harmful to oneself or others, or similarly counterproductive. I Just about everything done in this world at the social level is counterproductive.

Pollution – This is a true global plague. It does enormous harm to the health of people around the world, and actually kills large numbers of people. Toxic materials, a plague of respiratory ailments, and what’s done about it? Very little, grudgingly, and only after the damage has been done. Prevention? Lip service at best. The world might as well be smoking 3 packets of cigarette a day. Intelligent, or stupid?

Stupidity can also be defined as not doing things that need doing. The news is like watching a house burn down and the occupants complaining about the fact that somebody invented fire, while conscientiously not calling the fire brigade.

The writing angle

Now consider the process of writing about stupidity:

  • Some moron has done something incredibly stupid.
  • You need to explain the situation.
  • You need to understand the logic of the situation.
  • You need, in effect, to understanding the thinking of absolute morons.

Put it this way – How many avoidable wars, disasters, economic crashes, and social catastrophes have happened in the last 20 years? How did they happen? What could have been done better? Did stupidity play a major role?

Results – Millions of dead, maimed, dispossessed, impoverished, neglected, people, and none of it needed to happen. Writing about damage control, perhaps? Nothing is ever done well, problems always remain, people continue to be shafted, but on a global scale.

When writing about these subjects, you have two choices – You can be a standard pooper, that is stick to the story and not point out how stupid these situations are and how hopelessly dumb the causes are. That’s the mainstream approach, and it sucks like a psychotic vacuum cleaner.

These days, I don’t give a damn what people think of me as a writer. I do, however, try to be honest, and I can tell you this – Stupidity directly or indirectly kills and injures more people than most wars and plagues every day.

The only thing I want to write in future about stupidity is its obituary. It won’t be a very sympathetic piece.

www.sydneymediajam.comNow thoroughly fed up with not being able to update SMJ. Expect some developments.


Why do poor people support conservatism?


Wasp2It’s one of the great mysteries. The people who are most despised by conservatives support conservatism. Maybe it’s upbringing, maybe it’s religion, maybe it’s just good ‘ol stupidity. The fact seems to be that these people support those who couldn’t be paid to spit on them.

Conservative policies target health, education, employment, and basic civil rights. They’re usually a minority with clout far beyond their democratic demographics. The NRA’s total membership is about 1% of the US population, yet they dictate gun policy to the GOP, which has about 20-25% of the popular vote, (bearing in mind that only about 40% of eligible people in the US actually vote)

The 1% has 60% of the wealth, and you can assume they won’t be sharing that wealth with the poor any time soon. 158 families in the US, (including, ironically someone with a family name which is part of the German side of my family) are providing 50% of the GOP donations for 2016.

American Valhalla page 28 Are we poor enough yet page 11 Are we poor enough yet page 12  Are we poor enough yet page 14 DC Doom page 28  DC Doom page 30Conservatism is about government of the rich, by the rich, for the rich. It always has been. The Roman Republic was split along economic/social lines, in the patricians and the plebeians. There’s only one way to cross this divide, and it’s with money, not democratic principles of equality.

When it comes to support, there’s also the “status” factor, aka the “social delusions” factor. Voting for the rich means “me too”, in many ways. Pathetic as this may be, it’s understandable, if you consider “me too” to mean aspirations.

Less credible is the fact that it’s also wishful thinking on the part of those whose social status needs some work. Modern conservatism is pretty trashy in some ways. It gives the illusion that even the sour little bastards in middle management and the self-promoters in finance and media are somehow turned in to conservatives by association.

They’re not. They’re still the same rat like, untrustworthy, backstabbing suburban slobs from Schmuck City, but they’re wearing suits and hobnobbing with real people, so they look like somebodies. They come and go. For every pathetic blue jacket and sycophantic boyish college hairstyle, about 100 of these pseudo-guys pass through the bowels of real conservative dynamics per day. They’re in, and then they’re out. Nobody knows or cares who they are, but they think they’re part of the machinery. A few may make careers out of it; most won’t.

(Compare these Santa’s Little Helpers to lobbyists, who make millions with a few friendly phone calls and some schmoozing. The party hacks are basically cornflakes in this environment.)

What’s really bizarre, and almost totally counterintuitive, is the superficiality of the conservative image in this regard. The forever-yelling-at-top-of-voice-online conservatism isn’t conservatism. It’s paid cheerleading, by people who are “political outworkers”. It’s also an invented ideology, telling people who to root for, and if you look at the online threads, they even use the same phrases all the time.

If you’re thinking that recruiting the wannabes, losers and underachievers in to this environment is easy with a whiff of money, bingo. They get to call themselves conservatives, which admittedly does sound a lot nicer than “social corpses”, and get to wear buttons, etc.

They are then pointed at “the enemy”, which in American politics is other Americans. They are told there’s such a thing as The Left, and that these people are trying to steal their rights, which like all good conformists, they’ve totally abrogated in the name of the word “conservativism”.

Check out the working logic:

  • Civil rights = Now whiter and brighter than ever.
  • Communism = Anything which involves paying with your own money for anything.
  • Constitution = Excuse for self.
  • Corporations = Good. Corporate laws and regulations = Bad.
  • Democrats = Bad.
  • Environment = Excuse for crimes and plea bargains.
  • Earth = Some place on the Discovery Channel.
  • Education = How to find FOX on the remote.
  • Eisenhower = Some guy.
  • Family values = Now with auditing options.
  • God = Excuse for anything, one of the best.
  • GOP = Good.
  • Guns = Good.
  • Hate groups = Downmarket.
  • Health = Illegal for anyone in lower income brackets.
  • Law enforcement = Highly profitable, good franchising opportunities.
  • Libertarians = Better than good.
  • Lincoln = Some guy.
  • Military budget = Self-made billionaires who did it their way.
  • Nixon = Good.
  • Not shooting people = Bad.
  • Oil = Good.
  • Organized crime = Never heard of it.
  • Pollution = Death for others. (Conservatives are immune to poisons and diseases)
  • Poor people = Bad criminals.
  • Poverty = Cheaper than jails for the poor.
  • Public money = Your very own personal property, grab a few truckloads.
  • Racism = The easy way to avoid actual democracy.
  • Reagan = Better than good.
  • Religion = Excuse for self and personal behavior.
  • Rich people = Good saints.
  • Roosevelt, Franklin Delano = The Anti-Christ, responsible for the New Deal and the theory of treating other Americans like human beings.
  • Roosevelt, Theodore = Some guy.
  • Taxes = Bad communism, especially if payable by you.
  • World War 2 = The triumph of democracy, forget FDR and Truman.

The fact that few people on the other side believe it’s worth talking to conservatives on any subject is based on this set of cookie cutter values. All issues boil down to these basic good/bad equations. Would you bother talking to anyone who’s going to instantly categorize any incident according to these values?

The poor are typically a few generations behind everyone else, in both amenities and social knowledge. They’re the economic hicks from the sticks, and if they support something because it looks good and pays money, it’s understandable. If it’s easier to understand than the multi-faceted, very unpleasant complexities of modern issues according to the other side, that’s understandable too. It’s just that it’s so absurd.

LOGO with Sydney Media Jam edit 300PPI